<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: oDesk Global Outsourcing Statistics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.samasource.org/odesk-global-outsourcing-statistics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.samasource.org/odesk-global-outsourcing-statistics/</link>
	<description>Give Work</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 23:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mariaumar</title>
		<link>http://blog.samasource.org/odesk-global-outsourcing-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>mariaumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 13:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samasource.org/?p=258#comment-94</guid>
		<description>This is interesting but I am far more interested in finding out why Pakistan, despite being one of the top 2 in Value For Money services (the other being Phillipines), has such a low average rate percentile of only 64?

I feel that providers from some countries are being manipulated (maybe a strong word but that&#039;s how I feel) by buyers on oDesk. What happens usually is that most buyers prefer native speaker of English and try and hire people/firms from countries like the U.S. These providers of course find it impossible to deliver a 150 articles of 500+ words each within a week&#039;s time so they further outsource in small batches to other providers.

Providers who bid the least get the job. An excellent work is done by &#039;em (in most cases) for a very meager amount. The original provider gets all the accolades and the money. Hallelujah for them.

Question is: why do buyers not realize that? Why not hire these people in the first place for a decent amount?

I am not complaining for myself. I a doing fine. Just that after reading this report on oDesk about providers from Phillipines and Pakistan being top of the list for value for money I got to wonder why these people were settling for so little.

Maybe oDesk could help in some way. I dunno.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is interesting but I am far more interested in finding out why Pakistan, despite being one of the top 2 in Value For Money services (the other being Phillipines), has such a low average rate percentile of only 64?</p>
<p>I feel that providers from some countries are being manipulated (maybe a strong word but that&#8217;s how I feel) by buyers on oDesk. What happens usually is that most buyers prefer native speaker of English and try and hire people/firms from countries like the U.S. These providers of course find it impossible to deliver a 150 articles of 500+ words each within a week&#8217;s time so they further outsource in small batches to other providers.</p>
<p>Providers who bid the least get the job. An excellent work is done by &#8216;em (in most cases) for a very meager amount. The original provider gets all the accolades and the money. Hallelujah for them.</p>
<p>Question is: why do buyers not realize that? Why not hire these people in the first place for a decent amount?</p>
<p>I am not complaining for myself. I a doing fine. Just that after reading this report on oDesk about providers from Phillipines and Pakistan being top of the list for value for money I got to wonder why these people were settling for so little.</p>
<p>Maybe oDesk could help in some way. I dunno.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: software outsourcing</title>
		<link>http://blog.samasource.org/odesk-global-outsourcing-statistics/comment-page-1/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>software outsourcing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 08:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samasource.org/?p=258#comment-93</guid>
		<description>thanks for sharing this wonderful report. This is awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for sharing this wonderful report. This is awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
